Gender in South Asia Essay

These devil contradictory comments be approximately women the first champion is the unmitigated dictum which is still going on in our club and it had always been a consequence from the time of Mahabharat to the present twenty-four hours that women do non leave al angiotensin converting enzyme birth the office staff to be an indep completeent human macrocosm. And in the second comment a passably sex desires to lead her vivification to her cause coincide by refuting the aged domination. She wishs to caste a rebellion against the senile hegemony which creates a marge over feminine granting immunity.It seems as if she wants to retire from the above-named patriarchal dictum. These be 2 disciplines which I want to focus in my term paper which exists till at present in our instaling of South-Asia in usual and Bangladesh in particular. I want to demo how South- Asian women face patriarchal subjection and how they commence started to lead her life to th eir take in accord. I want to establish these particulars done Selina Hossains two short stories Motijans Daughters and The world of applaud and Labour.I scram out Bangladesh among so m either South- Asian countries because the stories from Bangladesh similarly contri precisely ifed to our experience of remembering the scattered and disjoint body of Bengali womens report, we are ashamed to acknowledge this hardly the fact trunk that we had been largely ignorant of the passing tycoonful body of womens write from our neighboring country despite our overlap inheritance of langu historic period and culture. The distinct features of the above-mentioned texts, twain in terms of satiate and treatment, bring out the semipolitical, religious nd culture specifities that inform womens writing from Bangladesh.In these two stories the roundting is clownish and the women, who hit the power to destabilize the shape quo of the sexse, function within village community. The function bunghole this rural setting, according to me, is lie in the fact that urbanization is a fairly upstart phenomenon there. And the writers are possessing cosy links with their native villages. And I get h senile of Selina Hossain because she is one of the most classic women writers of Bangladesh.Her thickheaded preceptions of nature and human psyche own made her writings unique and absorbing. She in her writings depict the role of a char fair sex in the social and heathenish movement of her country. She points to the challenges faced by women, to the decisions taken by women in social and political cries. Now I want to signalise how two above-mentioned themes function done with(predicate) Selina Hossains two stories. In Selina Hossains Motijans Daughters, the central character Motijan at a lower place goes a lugubrious marital life because of the malevolence and maltreatment of her mother-in-law Gulnur and economize Abul.She is physically and mentally tortur ed and she looses her indistinguishability both as a female and maiden manage. (1) She looses the very She in her. She is blamed as Sterile cleaning woman. All her appetite of proper mother is shattered by her married man Abul as he has an illegal kindred with Rasui. So he does not safekeeping for Motijan. She is continually tortured by her mother-in-law as her vex is un adapted to pay the promised constituent. This dowry system is a moving phenomenon in our society for which m any(prenominal) another(prenominal) women have to face tremendous torture in fronthand and after(prenominal) their marriage.Rabindranath Tagore has shown us how Nirupama, in his flooring Dena Paona had to face a fatal final stage as her puzzle was unable to divide the promised dowry. still here, Selina Hossain deviates from Tagore. Her character Motijan has change herself from a helpless creature unable(predicate) of even the slightest protest to a woman who can choose the man she desires and not simply put up with her husband who abuses and ignores her. She proves her fertility by making an extra-marital human affinity with Lokman and like an Angry young woman chooses her own life to her own accord.She wants to check what Benares in Vijay Tendulkars Silence The salute Is In Sessoon, wanted to tell My life is my own I go out do what I like or she wants to do what the duchess of Malfi had done in websters The Duchess of Malfi. Motijan has accomplish her desire by crossing strategical Essecentialism (2). Kunti in Mahabharat was not able to make human race about her illicit relationship and about her son Karna but Motijan is able to do that. Motijan b grey-hairedly makes public about her extramarital affair by f etceteraing two lady friends in her hand.Accordingly to Lacan each desire is a misrecognition. In the chance of Motijan, her desire is non maidenlike because she negates her feminine identicalness of married woman or Sati to become a mother. S he chooses Lokman not because she loves her, she makes a relation with him plainly to come out from the blame of antisepsis given by her mother-in-law Gulnur. Thus, Motijans desire for Lokman is ultimately misrecognised. She takes her desire for Lokman as a weapon of rebellion by which she negates her feminine identity of wife and scores her female identity by loose birth of two female children.Jahanara Imams The utensil depicts not merely the trauma of a woman who is raped brutally but the specifies of her suffering acquire a bleak political significance as chhabiran resists the ruby-red take-over of the territory of her body and land by Pakistani forces. As chhabiran uses her desire as a weapon like politic Motijan as well takes her desire as a weapon to rebel against her mother-in-law. Another important theme in this story is the ontogeny of women by women. Gulnur is like the customs dutyal mother-in-law of our society who maintains her tradition by torturing her daugh ter-in-law.Inspite of creation a women she continually maltreats Motijan. As the mother-in-laws are also tortured by their mother-in-laws, so they carry on this torture as if it is a legacy to them. barely they real gain exploitation not any advantage. except when they use it, it becomes negative legacy. Gulnur is doing the same. Gulnur has not judged her self as a woman. She has been influenced by the conventional tradition of our society and has judged herself as a scratch of oppression. Another important theme is about the birth of female child.In Aitereya Brahaman, 6/3/7/13 from Taslima Nasreens Selected Columns it is stated that the birth of a daughter was considered a curse. Therefore it is self-asserting that a pregnant woman should realize so that her child may be a male. This is the concept of Vedic age and it is still now very A-one and static code in our society. And in this story same thing happens with Motijan after giving birth of two female children. Gulnu r, her mother-in-law wants to drive out her from the house by claiming that family line bequeath not be saved by female children. still Motijan, like a new woman retaliates over Gulnur by rearing the children with design care and pride. Her pride is equal to the heroine Hester Pryne in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter who feels proud of her daughter Pearl. And her anger is equal to treasure Porter of Osbornes Look rearward in Anger. In Brihadaranyak Upanishad from Taslima Nasrees Selected Coloumns it is tell that wife must walk behind her husband and The Satpath Brahamana directs women to find out the husband but Motijans husband Abul who is not desirable of a husband even not worthy of a human beingness, so there is no question to come about her.Besides, his torture and his smoking of bidi keep Motijan in a Claustrophobic situation. Abul does not do the least duty of a husband. That is wherefore she does not consider him even as a member against which she can se t a rebellion. Besides, why always women should follow Men? This is totally a power play patriarchy. And according to me, every Motijan should disobey every Abul like husband as they are not worthy of being a husband. One of the synonyms of woman is bharjya one who is borne. These is a similarity in introduction between the words bharjya bhirtya a wife and a servant.Motijan is toughened like bhirtya buckle down in her family not as a lawful wife. The ending of the story is solid because although the story ends, the struggle of Motijan does not end. It is honourable the beginning of her struggle where she lead have to face to a greater extent complexity from aged society. She has brought two new Motijan whom she will have to make ready to struggle against by and by Abuls and Gulnurs. Through the ending of the story Selina Hossain wants to tell that the revolt which Motijan has started is not the revolt of Motijan only but the revolt of every women of our South- Asian soc iety in general and Bangladesh in particular.It is the revolt of those women who are the victims of such paternal and matriarchal oppressions. And the struggle which Motijan has started is unending, there is frequently left to gain her proper conscionableifiedly and resigndom. Likewise, women of South-Asia will have to struggle more to acquire their ripe(p) and true necessitousdom. Selina Hossains another story The world of Love and Labour shows that Amzad Mia, Fulbanus father wants to give marriage of Fulbanu to Kasem khan who has already two wives, for the greed of land.In spite of being a father he considers her daughter as an element of exchangeable trade good. This is not the present concept of our society. In Mahabharat we see that Arjun told Kunti, after bringing Draupadi by connecting her that he has brought a thing which he wants to give her mother. So, since the days of Mahabharat women are treated as an object not as a human being. Taslima Nasreen in her Sele cted Columns writes Milk,curdles,eggs and coconuts rot, so does a woman. Thus, we see that society applies the term to a woman as if she is an object.Taslima Nasreen in her Selected Columns again shows that Samartha Sabdokosh which is a fantastic addition to the Bengali language and literature, uses synonyms for a Man Purushmanush , Manab, Manush etc while for women synonyms are Stri,Meye,Ramani etc. The numerous synonyms for woman however do not mention Manush which simply substance Human. But Fulbanu stops her fathers Conspiracy in order to apprise him a lesson that she is also a human being and her desire should also be valued.She marries Kasem caravan inn secretly without giving any information to her father and her family so that her father cannot get the property offered by Kasem Khan. On the other hand she wants to teach a lesson to Kasem Khan also. Kasem is a deputy of neo-colonialism. (3) In Neo-Colonialist concept one soulfulness esteems himself to be top-hole wit hout thinking what others think about him as he marries many women only to fulfil his lust without compassionate any body. He gives wrong capriciousness of his practicing Polygamy that as he has no children so to save the family line he wants to attach Fulbanu.We find that it is not a recent phenomenon. In Aitereya Brahmana from Taslima Nasreens Selected Columns it is stated that a woman cannot marry more than once. eventide if a man has many wives, one husband is enough for a woman. genuinely there is a medical precedent behind this polygamy and to prove this matter I want to refer Taslima Nasreens view, who in her Selected Columns tells that between the age of fifty and seventy many men suffer from an magnification of Prostate Gland. This enlargement of the gland leads to an add-on in sexual desire, though the end is likely to be permanent impotence.These old men, because of an enlarged gland, are suddenly laid-off with excessive sexual urge and huge to get them selves wives. Many try to precept these men need a gent in their old age. They prefer to marry adolescent girl rather than old woman. The case of Kasem Khan is also the same. Kasem Khan also reminds the example of Prophet Mohammed. But Fulbanu Shatters his dream of enjoying her and also proves that the two wives do not suffer from infertility. The true fact is that Kasem Khan Is impotent and for that he has no children.The Aitereya Brahmana gives from Taslima Nasreens Selected Columns unreserved praise to a woman who never Contradicts their husband. The two wives before Fulbanu blindly accept this concept. They neither refutes Kasem Khan nor try to discover the actual lawfulness behind their infertility. But Fulbanu, like a new woman deviates from that cheap evaluate norm of blindly receiving patriarchal hegemony. She gains her freedom by refuting that hegemony and hierarchy created by her father and Kasem Khan. I hope, she creates an example of freedom which will become an agenda t o the girls who are the victims of such oppression.At the end of the story without caring anybody and without receiving any Talaq or Divorce she just starts a new journey to an obscure path. She does not know what fate will awaiting her. But she frees her self from the bondage of patriarchal hegemony and now she chooses a life of free bird. She wants to find her own place to stand firm in Virginia woolfs famous way of life of ones own where any bondage is prohibited. She wants to become the mistress of her own desire. Thus the two heroines of Selina Hossains through their tragic end ( as they both do not leade a traffic pattern happy lives ) prove the dictum any tragedy is a story of excerption .They both negate the traditional sexuality roles which cast men as rational, strong, preventative etc, while women are emotional, weak, submissive. They prove that sexuality is a cultural construction, not a biological one. Men think themselves superior that is why they are super ior benedick Andersons view (4). Actually they want to prove that no one is superior from the first days. Women also know how to build equality by breaking superiority . And through these stories Selina Hossain proves herself as a womens rightist writer.Her characters are the representatives of the contemporary fates of South-Asian women. Her private use has thus become a public feminine issue. She prefers to cast her rebellion against the Patriarchal oppression not by stain but by Pen and I hope, she is very much successful in this fact. Virgin Woolf in her story of Judith lamented For who shall amount the heat and violence of a poets heart when caught and tangled in a womans body ? . But I hope Selina Hossain has no case to lament because she has created writings which is totally free from male influence.And her writing may be treated under Gynocentricism (5) Elaine Showalters design as she in three phases ( feminine, libber and female ) proves that she remains a fair g entle woman through her writings. Thus, through my term paper I want to tell that the women of South-Asia partly achieved their success of independence. But if there is to be a true female independence too, much remains to be done. But the struggle which has started by Motijan, Fulbanu and Selina Hossain herself is a great achievement. Their struggle is like a torch whose light will show path for the true right and freedom for women.