Comparative Essay: Hamlet vs. King Lear Essay

baron Lear and Hamlet ar two of Shakespeares superior tragedies where he has developed complex char shamers that create more problems for themselves as a result of their natures. twain Hamlet and King Lear are protagonists who believe that things close to them should be inherently good at all times and that rafts motives and actions should always be truthful and fair. Nevertheless, inwardly both novels we see different characteristics of these main characters as nearly that evidently separate them.Hamlet is a strong developed somebody who has difficulty coming to terms with both corrupt events that occur around him. He can be seen and noned as a very pessimistic and bitter minded individual however, this attitude is generally seen when he is attempting to suppress his hatred and fury towards the extreme events that have occurred in his life, this majorly referring to the destruction of his fetch. The greatest ignominious shortcoming that he portrays within the entir ety of the dictation would be over analyzing and over thinking every event that takes determine in his place, regardless of the importance.For instance, in all of the soliloquies where Hamlet is speaking, he discusses and plots ideas involving avenging his fathers death however, he has much delay when it comes to the murdering of his uncle. As a result of his faith in God, at one point he worried that if he had taken the life of his uncle whilst he was praying then his mortal would be sent straight forth to Heaven. This delayed him with acting upon his decision, and this is mainly as a result of the morals and beliefs that he has. The shameful flaw of over thinking in this situation obstructed his laid step up path to the vengeance of his fathers life.Overanalyzing is also a constitute fatal flaw that is explored throughout the character of King Lear as headspring however, in this circumstance, we see that after over thinking a situation, it is mainly his great gazump that results in his downfall. King Lear ultimately wants to divide his ground up between his three daughters however, in order to receive the greatest amount of land, King Lear decided that it would be just for each of his daughters to report their love for their father. King Lear, being blinded by his own arrogance, did not see that his two oldest daughters directly lied to his face when proclaiming their devotion towards him. It was however his youngest daughter, Cordelia, who spoke to her father with complete honesty, even though it take to her ostracism from the kingdom.The fundamental part of Lears error in judgment was that he only wanted to hear positive attributes about himself being exclaimed, and erst he heard something remotely negative, he exploded with fury. He ends up giving away his land to his two eldest daughters, and later realizes that their intentions with it were tout ensemble selfish. We can see that King Lear, similar to Hamlet, did not see that peoples tr ue intention could be so negative and demeaning. particularly from his own daughters he expected nothing but the purest of actions. His great pride overtook his whole mind and body, and as a result, Lear ended up within his own realm of madness, alone and fearful.Both of Shakespeares characters, King Lear and Hamlet, act in certain ways as a result of the military personnel in which they find themselves placed in. This is mainly seen through King Lear, who starts off within the feed as a character who requires constant heed and love, and later realizes that his blindness to the true intentions of his daughters is what led him to complete insanity and the handout of all feelings of pride. As a result of this, we pock that the age residue, and difference in generations in which King Lear and his daughters were raised in is what ultimately led to his blindness and the loss of all his possessions, for his daughters, Goneril and Regan, are directly opposed to any ideas of loyalty, authority, respect or order.With Hamlet, however, we see that the death of his father is one of the conducive factors that execute to the tragedies that followed along. Hamlets inherent tendency to overanalyze all situations that he is presented with is the biggest cause of his isolation and his removal from all reality by the end of the play. As a result of this, we see that Hamlets fatal flaw begins as something internal and carries out all throughout the play remaining untouched.Both characters, Hamlet and King Lear, possess characteristics and personality traits that bequeath them to their isolation and fear. Shakespeare brilliantly showed us that even a single fatal flaw within a character has the potential to ultimately lead them to extreme failure, and we see this characteristic especially within these two protagonists. Both of them started off inherently good, however, as a result of their failure to notice peoples ungrateful and selfish characteristics, they ended up wit h nothing.